The Quixotic Leader

A guy named Derek Sivers draws lessons on leaders, followers, and the growth of movements from this video of a lone dancer who slowly and then more and more rapidly draws a group of fellow dancers. Unamuno would say this is a man who is following his Dulcinea, the “sublime madness…the magnanimous purity of intention with which he purified the world, his world…forgetting himself, he found his own great depth…”

This comes via Kottke, who connects such theorizing to Kurt Vonnegut’s three types of specialist present at any revolution, from the novel [Bluebeard](http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005IHW8GY/ref=as_li_ss_til?tag=j.estes-20&camp=0&creative=0&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=B005IHW8GY&adid=0799TGWTJ9J0P9EN15D8).

The rarest of these specialists, he says, is an authentic genius — a person capable of having seemingly good ideas not in general circulation. “A genius working alone,” he says, “is invariably ignored as a lunatic.”

The second sort of specialist is a lot easier to find: a highly intelligent citizen in good standing in his or her community, who understands and admires the fresh ideas of the genius, and who testifies that the genius is far from mad.

The third sort of specialist is a person who can explain everything, no matter how complicated, to the satisfaction of most people, no matter how stupid or pigheaded they may be

Miguel de Unamuno

Like eternity of time, silence of sound, and oblivion of memory, so is peace the substance of war. To preach prudence is to preach death, in the majority of cases; to combat the madness of the dream life is to undermine heroism. Grasp the fact that you are the world, and strive to save it so that you may save yourself. The world is your world, your world is you, though not the the egotist’s I, but the man. Within the world, my world, which is me, I am one of so many others.
If we give ourselves up to quixotic madness we may, in moments of sane contemplation, sanctify the most awful and bone-deep weariness and discouragement, so that one day, when our fortunes are mended and our judgment sounder, we may behold immortality, which is conquered by force of feats and travail. We must always let ourselves be guided by the peerless Dulcinea, who is the star leading us to the eternity of effort.

— “Quixotism”
 

D.H. Lawrence

And then, in the blowing clouds, she saw a band of faint iridescence colouring in faint colours a portion of the hill. And forgetting, startled, she looked for the hovering colour and saw a rainbow forming itself. In one place it gleamed fiercely, and, her heart anguished with hope, she sought the shadow of iris where the bow should be. Steadily the colour gathered, mysteriously, from nowhere, it took presence upon itself, there was a faint, vast rainbow. The arc bended and strengthened itself till it arched indomitable, making great architecture of light and colour and the space of heaven, its pedestals luminous in the corruption of new houses on the low hill, its arch the top of heaven.

And the rainbow stood on the earth. She knew that the sordid people who crept hard-scaled and separate on the face of the world’s corruption were living still, that the rainbow was arched in their blood and would quiver to life in their spirit, that they would cast off their horny covering of disintegration, that new, clean, naked bodies would issue to a new germination, to a new growth, rising to the light and the wind and the clean rain of heaven. She saw in the rainbow the earth’s new architecture, the old, brittle corruption of houses and factories swept away, the world built up in a living fabric of Truth, fitting to the over-arching heaven.

— The Rainbow
 

Rainbows of Vengeance, Rainbows of Delight

That the hatemongers of a group that doesn’t deserve the dignity of me typing their name are blaming the Oklahoma tornado on Kevin Durant’s support of Jason Collins is, in its unnatural stupidity, the most unsurprising thing to come out of this natural disaster. These people are the definition of foolish consistency, and they are certainly small-minded hobgoblins, too, who don’t know shit about supercells. Kevin Durant donated a million dollars to the Red Cross, which is sure to please the heavens.

  • Here’s the real rainbow that appeared after the storm.
  • Speaking of rainbows, here’s the lady whose missing dog is found mid-interview. The dog makes its miraculous appearance at 1:33, but as far as elderly-tornado-survival interviews go, this one is classic. My favorite line comes in response to a question about whether she comprehends what has occurred here, as they survey the rubble. She says: “I know exactly what happened here. Exactly.”

And in honor of the passing of Ray Manzarek, The Doors’ Hammond organ player, here’s Jimmy Fallon, as Jim Morrison, covering “Reading Rainbow.” Not sure who the Manzarek impersonator is.

When Babies Strike!

I was glad to see at last this epidemic make the newspaper of record, after years of enduring eye pokes, hair pulls, and countless kicks in the crotch (a particular hazard of the family bed). I’ve always known, though, that I wasn’t alone.

Although much attention is paid to the safety of infants and toddlers, their sudden jabs, bites, head-butts and kicks can inflict injuries on caregivers, usually parents. After her 2-year-old daughter “clocked” her under the eye, leaving a significant shiner, Alaina Webster, 31, coined a term on her blog to describe this common problem: “unintentional parent abuse.”

Alas, there’s little to be done to remedy this accursed problem (except avoid children, not always a bad thing). I’m currently nursing a sliced-open finger that occurred while I was trying to protect a child who was, in his defense, only trying to get some love from me while I was using an exceptionally sharp knife to open letters. All things considered, I guess I’d rather have the love than my finger tip, but it sure hurt like hell. Some offer a fair rationalization:

“Being a good parent,” Dr. Hoffman said, “is taking one for the team.”

Comedy is Not Pretty, And Neither is Your Dinner Party (The Expurgated Version)

Kevin Ashton over at Medium delivering the ugly truth about the creative person’s relation to the world, which should, if you’re serious, involve a lot of saying No. No is the guardian of creative work, the theory goes.

Time is the raw material of creation. Wipe away the magic and myth of creating and all that remains is work: the work of becoming expert through study and practice, the work of finding solutions to problems and problems with those solutions, the work of trial and error, the work of thinking and perfecting, the work of creating. Creating consumes. It is all day, every day. It knows neither weekends nor vacations. It is not when we feel like it. It is habit, compulsion, obsession, vocation.

Saying “no” has more creative power than ideas, insights and talent combined. No guards time, the thread from which we weave our creations. The math of time is simple: you have less than you think and need more than you know. We are not taught to say “no.” We are taught not to say “no.” “No” is rude. “No” is for drugs and strangers with candy.

Somewhere he’s dug up this letter from Charles Dickens:

‘It is only half an hour’ — ‘It is only an afternoon’ — ‘It is only an evening,’ people say to me over and over again; but they don’t know that it is impossible to command one’s self sometimes to any stipulated and set disposal of five minutes — or that the mere consciousness of an engagement will sometime worry a whole day … Who ever is devoted to an art must be content to deliver himself wholly up to it, and to find his recompense in it. I am grieved if you suspect me of not wanting to see you, but I can’t help it; I must go in my way whether or no.”

That reminds me, and probably you—how could it not?—of Charles Dikkens, the esteemed Dutch author mentioned in this Python sketch, featuring Graham Chapman:

Speaking of comedy and literature, the poet Andrew Hudgins has made a series of videos to promote his forthcoming memoir, The Joker. Here’s a good one:

These two, this one and this one, meet at the intersection of marriage, hospitals, and sex.

John Cage

This is a lecture on composition which is indeterminate with respect to its performance. That composition is necessarily experimental. An experimental action is one the outcome of which is not foreseen. Being unforseen, this action is not concerned with excuse. Like the land, like the air, it needs none. A performance of a composition which is indeterminate of its performance is necessarily unique. It cannot be repeated. When performed for a second time, the outcome is other than it was. Nothing therefore is accomplished by such a performance, since that performance cannot be grasped as an object in time. A recording of such a work has no more value than a postcard; it provides a knowledge of something that happened, whereas the action was a non-knowledge of something that had not yet happened.

— “Composition as Process”
 

Some Poems + a Story

I can be had for the price of anything with bees in it, and this morning finished reading this terrific story by Kij Johnson, “At the Mouth of the River of Bees,” which is of course the title story of her book At the Mouth of the River of Bees.

The Birds and the Beers

If you are lucky, you live in one of those territories where the official state bird has some unique, distinctive place in the landscape and thus the life of the people who live there. Will Oremus at Slate does us all a big favor and goes through the list, state by state, and where necessary re-assigns birds to states that lack imagination.

This has been the most depressing post I have ever put together. Three robins but no blue jay? Seven cardinals but no owls or hawks? Five filthy mockingbirds? This is what we pay taxes for, folks.

For all his grousing, he doesn’t allocate enough raptors, but one thing I learned: there is at least one thing Oklahoma gets right.

Screen Shot 2013-05-20 at 11.10.49 AM
Screen Shot 2013-05-20 at 11.11.23 AM

And not to be outdone with its generous displays of excess, here are three minutes of beer cans being opened by (almost) every way imaginable, and then a few more beyond that.

Frank Stafford

I don’t think it matters how a poet plants his garden; it is the quality of the yield which matters. Just like the stars, there are so many things to be said of poets and poems. I am not content in just suggesting things by the use of words, I want to show the origins, the metaphors of reality, the free movement of the spirit. Poetry is a body, all right, but in spirit it is the function which oftentimes creates the organ.

Jean Cocteau said mystery exists only in precise things—people in situations, situations in people. Because I believe the visionary life has nothing to do with a necessarily transcendent existence, I like most of the poems I read. I believe most poets know this is the world; and when you try to lead a special life or write a special poetry, you are dancing with an imaginary partner at a meaningless dance to which you have invited yourself and no one else.

— “With the Approach of the Oak the Axeman Quakes”
 

The ship drove fast, loud roar’d the blast

If you have ever wondered who would win in a race between the Millenium Falcon and other famous space ships—Enterprise, Tardis, Galactica, etc.—Slate has built a graphical simulator that attempts to get to the bottom of this burning question. The reading on how they made their calculations is pretty interesting, if you’re into such things.

It’s a little odd that a genre about science, the field of precision, can be so imprecise. The truth is that spaceships almost always fly at the speed of the plot. But, for those who refuse to accept that, this is a definitive guide to ship speeds, based on highly scientific computer simulations and highly unscientific speculation.

Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 3.33.25 PM

First Book Interview

Thanks, Keith Montesano, for facilitating and publishing this interview about the publication of my first book, Kingdom Come (C&R Press, 2011), on the First Book Interviews Blog.

David Foster Wallace

[Sternberg's] needed a bowel movement for hours…He tried, back at O’Hare. But he was unable to, because he was afraid to, afraid that Mark, who has the look of someone who never just has to, might enter the rest room and see Sternberg’s shoes under a stall door and know that he, Sternberg, was having a bowel movement in that stall, infer that Sternberg had bowels, and thus organs, and thus a body. Like many Americans of his generation in this awkwardest of post-Imperial decades, an age suspended between exhaustion and replinishment, between input too ordinary to process and input to intense to bear, Sternberg is deeply ambivalent about being embodied; an informing fear that, were he really just an organism, he’d be nothing more than and ism of his organs.

— “Westward the Course of Empire Takes its Way”
 

12 Great Opening Film Shots

Twelve opening images from 12 Great/Very Good films, at The Criterion Collection.

I’m partial to this one, from Jean-Pierre Melville’s, Le Samourai
large_Samourai

43 Is Not the Meaning of the Universe

Between Facebook, which keeps us over-updated on the adult deeds of childhood friends, and nostalgia-insistent lists like this “43 Things That Will Make You Feel Old”, it’s little wonder being, or feeling like, a grown-up is difficult anymore. Maybe we’ve outgrown the whole concept of grown-up. Rather than making us feel old, these silly lists prevent us from being properly old. Nothing is allowed to take and keep its proper place. These lists serve no purpose but to draw in suckers to link to them. Insidious. (10 Presidents with Umbrellas on the other hand…)

Least Surprising
Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 5.43.54 AM

Sadly, Even Less Surprising
Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 5.44.31 AM